Skip to main content

service.ml_industrial()

Industrial Machine Learning

operating context

When ML stays a notebook without operational decisions

Industrial ML projects rarely fail because of the model itself: they fall on vague use cases, ungoverned data and missing ownership after go-live.

01

Use case framed as technology, not decision

Issue

The project starts from "we want to use ML" instead of "we want to improve this operational decision at this accuracy level".

Solution

Without a concrete operational decision as an anchor, any accuracy metric is self-referential and the business cannot use it.

02

Training data extracted one-off

Issue

The dataset is prepared with manual queries for the POC, and nobody rebuilds the pipeline when retraining or production is needed.

Solution

A versioned, reproducible data pipeline is the condition for a model to survive its first deploy.

03

Models in production without ownership

Issue

The model runs but nobody is accountable for drift monitoring, updates or retirement: it becomes an invisible object.

Solution

An orphan model in production is a risk: it keeps influencing operational decisions while nobody can answer for its degradation.

operating method

How we work: 4 phases in sequence

01

Data assessment

Evaluation of available data quality and quantity. Identification of highest-impact use cases.

Use caseOperational decisionKPI
02

Feature engineering

Extraction and transformation of relevant signals: vibrations, temperatures, consumption, process parameters.

Data assessmentFeature storeBaseline
03

Training and validation

Model training on historical data, cross-validation and testing on real data.

ModellingValidationThresholds
04

Deploy and monitoring

Production integration with real-time inference, drift monitoring and periodic retraining.

DeployDriftOwnership
expected output

The minimum package to do industrial ML seriously

The algorithmic part matters, but it must live inside a sustainable technical and operational setup.

Selection of problems truly suited to machine learning compared with simpler alternatives.

tech spec

Technical spec

explorer
architecture/ 2
operations/ 2
usecase-charter.ts
// use case anchor

Use case charter

Decision: Operational, concrete
KPI: Acceptable threshold
Baseline: Decision without ML
Use caseKPI
// reproducible pipeline

Reproducible data pipeline

Sources: MES, historian, sensors
Feature store: Versioned
Refresh: Batch + streaming
DataFeature store
// model registry

Model registry

Versioning: Model + dataset
Metadata: Metrics + approver
Stage: Dev/stage/prod
MLOpsRegistry
// drift control and ownership

Drift and ownership playbook

Monitoring: Statistical drift + data quality
Ownership: Engineering + operations
Retraining: Triggers + criteria
DriftOwnership
architecture/usecase-charter.ts Markdown
next_step.initialize

Need to take machine learning out of the notebook?

Clear use cases, governed data, monitored deploy — no orphan models in production.