Skip to main content

service.erp()

ERP for Industry

operating context

When the ERP is modelled on the org chart, not on the real process

ERPs often start as administrative projects and are later forced onto production. The result: configurations that do not speak the language of people on the shop floor.

01

ERP shaped around the org chart, not the flow

Issue

Modules mirror corporate functions, but the real process cuts across departments and ends up managed outside the system.

Solution

When operational flows do not match the ERP logic, production builds shadow-IT in Excel and decisions lose traceability.

02

Costing disconnected from real progress

Issue

Product cost is computed on theoretical standards without MES or data-collection feedback, so pricing and make-or-buy decisions rest on unverifiable numbers.

Solution

Without a feedback loop from the field, industrial accounting stays theoretical and per-job margins cannot be defended.

03

Ad-hoc integrations between ERP and shopfloor

Issue

Each line has its own bridge to the ERP with undocumented rules. Changing one rule opens unpredictable risks on the other sites.

Solution

A single integration pattern with production is needed, otherwise each new plant becomes a project to redo.

operating method

How we work: 4 phases in sequence

01

Process analysis

Mapping of production, logistics and administrative flows. Identification of ERP gaps.

Process discoveryReal flowsPain points
02

Configuration and development

Standard module setup, targeted customisation development and MES/SCADA integration.

Gap analysisERP modulesProcess fit
03

Data migration

ETL from legacy systems, data cleansing, validation and consistency testing.

Integration blueprintERP↔MESData model
04

Go-live and training

Planned cutover, role-based user training and 30-day hypercare support.

Rollout planPilotAdoption
expected output

What we produce in an ERP-for-industry engagement

We reduce the risk of incoherent configuration by starting from processes, data and production touchpoints.

Flow and responsibility design for the processes the ERP must genuinely support.

tech spec

Technical spec

explorer
architecture/ 2
operations/ 2
process-template.ts
// core industrial flows

Process template

Scope: Plan, procure, make, cost
Owner: Operations + Finance
Artifacts: Value stream + RACI
ISA-95Value stream
// ERP toward shopfloor

Integration map

Systems: ERP, MES, WMS, QMS
Pattern: Event + master data
Criterion: Single source of truth
MES↔ERPMaster data
// field-based costing

Costing with real feedback

Input: MES progress + scrap
Output: Actual job cost
Frequency: Continuous
CostingMargins
// multi-plant adoption plan

Rollout plan

Phases: Pilot → scale → stabilize
Criteria: Data readiness + training
Gate: Per-plant go/no-go
RolloutAdoption
architecture/process-template.ts Markdown
next_step.initialize

Need to realign the ERP to real shop-floor logic?

We start from processes, data and integrations — no modules switched on just because they exist.